Compare · Xverse
Xverse API alternative for querying ordinals and on-chain Bitcoin data
Xverse is a well-built Bitcoin wallet, and its API is a natural extension of that: it reads ordinals, inscriptions, BRC-20 tokens, Runes, UTXOs and rare sats, and it goes further by letting apps mint, etch and deploy with order management, cost estimation and status tracking. Payment is pay-per-request over Lightning, roughly a sat per call, which suits AI agents and apps that would rather not manage API keys. If your job is embedding wallet features or minting flows, it is a strong fit.
The reason developers look at Xverse API alternatives is data breadth and how you query it. BitcoinDatabase covers the Bitcoin chain, ordinals, inscriptions, BRC-20 events and Runes balances included, and exposes it three ways: a REST API with address history back to the 2009 genesis block, plus raw SQL and dashboards over the indexed chain, which grows with every new block. So you are not limited to per-address wallet lookups or minting endpoints. You can join inscription data against address balances, fund flows, entity labels and UTXOs in one SQL query, on usage-based plans built for analytics, research and compliance rather than minting. Everything here is informational on-chain data, not financial or investment advice, and collectible valuation is out of scope.
REST API · SQL · dashboards · address history since the 2009 genesis block
BTC
Balance trail
informational on-chain data · not financial advice
Xverse leads on wallet-native ordinals, Runes and BRC-20, including minting and order execution over Lightning, while BitcoinDatabase gives you the fully-indexed Bitcoin chain, ordinals data included, to query over REST, SQL and dashboards.
Side by side
Xverse vs BitcoinDatabase, honestly
A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.
| What matters | BitcoinDatabase | Xverse |
|---|---|---|
| Primary strength | Query the full indexed chain, ordinals and BRC-20 included | Wallet-native ordinals, minting and order execution |
| Access methods | REST API, SQL and dashboards | REST API, pay-per-call over Lightning |
| Minting and etching | No, read and query only | Yes, mint, etch and deploy with order management |
| Custom SQL | Yes, join ordinals against balances, flows and UTXOs | Endpoint responses rather than raw SQL |
| Data breadth | Whole chain: addresses, transactions, flows, labels, ordinals | Ordinals, Runes, BRC-20, UTXOs and rare sats |
| Pricing model | Usage-based paid plans, no free plan | Pay-per-request over Lightning, about a sat per call |
| Best suited for | Analytics, research and compliance on indexed data | Apps embedding wallet, ordinals and minting features |
Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.
Why teams pick BitcoinDatabase
The fully indexed Bitcoin blockchain, queryable by REST, SQL and dashboards
Ordinals data you can query, not just read
Inscriptions, sat numbers, BRC-20 events and Runes balances sit in the same indexed chain as addresses, balances and UTXOs. So a single SQL query can join an inscription to the address that holds it and the flow that moved it, instead of stitching wallet endpoints together.
Three ways to query
Call the REST API from an app, run SQL for research and reconciliation, or explore in dashboards, all against one fully-indexed Bitcoin chain. Each job uses the right tool without wiring per-address wallet calls into an analytics pipeline.
Honest about indexer state
BRC-20 balances are indexer-computed off-chain state, not enforced by the protocol, so providers can legitimately disagree. BitcoinDatabase is explicit about what is read directly from the chain versus computed, which matters when your numbers have to reconcile.
Good questions
Xverse vs BitcoinDatabase, answered
Explore the data
The Bitcoin data you can query here
Bitcoin ordinals and inscriptions API
Query Bitcoin ordinals, inscriptions, BRC-20 events and Runes balances from the same indexed chain, over REST and SQL.
ExploreQuery the Bitcoin blockchain with SQL
Write plain SQL against the whole indexed chain, no node, no ETL.
ExploreBitcoin address labels
Attach exchange, miner and service labels to addresses, so raw hashes read as entities.
ExploreBitcoin rich list
The largest balances ranked, with labels and historical snapshots.
ExploreMore comparisons
See how BitcoinDatabase compares
Glassnode alternative
Raw queryable Bitcoin data over REST, SQL and dashboards, not just curated charts.
vs BlockchairBlockchair alternative
Bitcoin-deep with every UTXO, entity labels, metrics, SQL and dashboards.
vs BlockCypherBlockCypher alternative
Bitcoin-native depth with SQL and dashboards, not just a multi-chain REST API.
vs Mempool.spaceMempool.space alternative
Indexed address, balance and history data over REST and SQL, alongside mempool and fees, on production plans.
vs BigQueryBigQuery alternative
Balances, entity labels and fund flows already indexed, without per-terabyte scan billing.
vs BitqueryBitquery alternative
Bitcoin-only depth over REST and SQL, billed on calls rather than on points that move with query shape.
vs TimechainIndexTimechainIndex alternative
Bitcoin-only like TimechainIndex, with published pricing and a commercial REST API.
vs CryptoQuantCryptoQuant alternative
API access on the entry plan and the raw chain underneath, not day-resolution metrics.
vs AlchemyAlchemy alternative
An indexed Bitcoin database you query by address, not a Bitcoin Core JSON-RPC passthrough.
vs QuickNodeQuickNode alternative
An indexed Bitcoin database you query by address, not a managed Core node with the address-capable calls switched off.
vs HiroHiro alternative
Hiro retired its Bitcoin Layer 1 APIs. The endpoints now answer HTTP 410 Gone, and the migration link inside that answer is itself dead.
vs AmberdataAmberdata alternative
Amberdata belongs to Kaiko as of June 2026. Its pricing page loads but publishes no number, and its API answers a missing key three different ways.
vs EllipticElliptic alternative
Elliptic publishes no pricing and sells its screening API only on a negotiated contract. We measured its endpoints, and the OFAC list underneath it, on 4 September 2026.
vs Merkle ScienceMerkle Science alternative
Merkle Science publishes no pricing and gates every product behind a demo. We measured its site, its API documentation and its blockchain coverage on 6 September 2026.
vs Coin MetricsCoin Metrics alternative
Coin Metrics is now Talos and its pricing page is gone. We measured the redirects, the free community API and the exact metrics it withholds on 8 September 2026.
vs CoinGlassCoinGlass alternative
CoinGlass publishes exchange balances per wallet address, hourly and rounded, from $29 a month with no free tier. We measured its plans, its documented precision and its Bitcoin gaps on 10 September 2026.
vs Crypto APIsCrypto APIs alternative
Crypto APIs covers 35+ networks from $49 a month. For Bitcoin fee rates, balances and history, we measured where a Bitcoin-only index does the job better and where it does not.
vs TatumTatum alternative
Tatum covers 130+ blockchains from $49 a month. For Bitcoin history, balances at a past block and fee rates, we priced its plans and measured the Bitcoin side on 22 Sep 2026.
vs NOWNodesNOWNodes alternative
NOWNodes sells shared node and Blockbook access across 100+ networks from 20 euros a month. We read its price list and hit its Bitcoin endpoints on 26 Sep 2026.
vs GetBlockGetBlock alternative
GetBlock sells shared nodes on 130+ chains, priced in compute units, from $49 a month. We read its plan table and CU rules and probed its Bitcoin endpoints on 27 Sep 2026.
vs ArkhamArkham Intelligence alternative
Arkham names wallets across seven networks and grants its API by application. We read its access terms and probed its API on 28 Sep 2026.
vs SantimentSantiment alternative
Santiment sells 1,000+ metrics across 2,800 assets over GraphQL. We read its plans and tested its Bitcoin balance query against the chain on 29 Sep 2026.
vs NansenNansen alternative
Nansen labels wallets across 38 chains, and Bitcoin is one of them. We read its API docs, credit table and pay-per-call terms on 30 Sep 2026.
vs AlliumAllium alternative
Allium sells enterprise blockchain data across dozens of chains, Bitcoin included. We read its docs, unit tables and keyless pricing on 1 Oct 2026.
vs FlipsideFlipside alternative
Flipside sold its blockchain data business to SonarX in May 2026 and its old domain now redirects to an enterprise AI product. We checked what is left on 2 Oct 2026.
vs SonarXSonarX alternative
SonarX ships Bitcoin as Snowflake shares, file dumps and Kafka streams, and turns on Bitcoin balances and REST on request. We read its Bitcoin page and checked its pricing URL on 5 Oct 2026.
vs GoldRushGoldRush alternative
GoldRush, the API formerly sold as Covalent, covers 100 plus chains and gives Bitcoin three endpoints. We read its Bitcoin docs and pricing page on 6 Oct 2026.
vs ScorechainScorechain alternative
Scorechain is a Luxembourg blockchain analytics firm covering 25 plus chains. We read its site, its QuickNode add-on docs and pricing on 7 Oct 2026.
vs AMLBotAMLBot alternative
AMLBot sells wallet checks, KYT monitoring and KYC to crypto businesses across many chains. We read its site and plan guide on 8 Oct 2026.
Query the whole Bitcoin blockchain in one place
An address in, structured on-chain data out. BitcoinDatabase serves balances, UTXOs, transactions, entity labels and fund flows, with address history back to the 2009 genesis block over REST, and SQL and dashboards over the indexed chain. No node to run.
REST + SQL + dashboards · new blocks within seconds · informational on-chain data only