Compare · BigQuery

BigQuery Bitcoin dataset alternative for balances, labels and flows

Google's BigQuery public dataset is a genuinely good piece of infrastructure. bigquery-public-data.crypto_bitcoin holds the Bitcoin chain as blocks, transactions, inputs and outputs, it tracks within about three blocks of the tip, and if your team already works in BigQuery you can join it against your own tables on day one.

The difference people weigh when they look for a BigQuery Bitcoin dataset alternative is how much the raw tables leave you to build, and what the scan meter costs while you build it. BitcoinDatabase indexes balances, UTXOs, entity labels and fund flows ahead of time and serves them over a REST API, SQL and dashboards, so the same question becomes a lookup instead of a scan. Usage-based paid plans, no free plan, informational on-chain data only.

or see the comparison ↓

REST API · SQL · dashboards · address history since the 2009 genesis block

Query Console

BTC address or sample query

btc

try:

Hit Run to query the Bitcoin blockchain.

Live from the chain for .

BTC

Balance trail

informational on-chain data · not financial advice

REST API · SQL · dashboards, one indexed dataset. Reading the chain ...

BigQuery is the better fit when you want raw Bitcoin tables sitting inside your own warehouse, while BitcoinDatabase gives you balances, entity labels and flows already computed over REST, SQL and dashboards.

Side by side

BigQuery vs BitcoinDatabase, honestly

A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.

What matters	BitcoinDatabase	BigQuery
Primary strength	Balances, UTXOs, labels and flows already indexed	Raw chain tables inside your own cloud warehouse
Data model	Bitcoin-native schema, addresses and balances first-class	Four ETL tables: blocks, transactions, inputs, outputs
Access methods	REST API, SQL and dashboards	SQL and client libraries, no Bitcoin REST endpoints
Address balance	One lookup returns the current balance	You aggregate outputs received minus outputs spent
Entity labels	Entity labels ship with the indexed chain	Not in the public dataset, bring your own table
Billing unit	Usage-based plans on API calls and queries	Per terabyte scanned, first terabyte each month free
Data freshness	New blocks within seconds	Public dataset runs about three blocks behind the tip
Best suited for	Teams that want Bitcoin answers, not an aggregation layer to maintain	Teams already on the platform joining chain data to their own warehouse

Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.

Why teams pick BitcoinDatabase

The fully indexed Bitcoin blockchain, queryable by REST, SQL and dashboards

Balances are indexed, not re-aggregated

Bitcoin has no balance field. The chain records outputs, so in a raw dataset a balance is a query across every output ever paid to an address minus the ones later spent, and you pay for the bytes that query touches every single time you run it. BitcoinDatabase maintains balances as indexed state, so asking for one is a lookup and asking for ten thousand is one request.

A REST API, not only a warehouse

BigQuery exposes a job-based SQL interface, which is exactly right for analytics and the wrong shape for a page that has to render an address balance in milliseconds. BitcoinDatabase serves the same indexed chain three ways, so an application calls the REST endpoint while analysts run SQL against the identical data, with no second pipeline to keep in sync.

Cost you can predict before you run it

When billing follows bytes scanned, the price of an answer depends on how the question was written. Partitioning, clustering and dry runs all help, but exploration is precisely the moment you do not yet know which columns you need. Usage-based pricing on calls and queries prices the answer rather than the scan, which is easier to forecast and easier to defend in a budget.

Good questions

BigQuery vs BitcoinDatabase, answered

Yes. Google hosts it as bigquery-public-data.crypto_bitcoin, structured as blocks, transactions, inputs and outputs, tracking roughly three blocks behind the chain tip. You query it in standard SQL from a Google Cloud project and pay for the data your queries scan rather than for access to the dataset itself.

On-demand analysis is billed per terabyte of data scanned, published at $6.25 per TiB in US regions with the first terabyte each month free, checked in August 2026. The cost of a Bitcoin query therefore depends on the columns and partitions it touches, not on how many rows it returns. Check the current rate before budgeting.

No. The public dataset is raw chain data: blocks, transactions, inputs and outputs. Exchange, mining pool and service labels come from separate third-party datasets you join in yourself, which is why analysts end up maintaining a labels table of their own. BitcoinDatabase ships entity labels as part of the indexed chain.

Not as a single field, because Bitcoin does not store balances anywhere. You reconstruct one by summing every output paid to the address and subtracting the outputs that have since been spent. That is a correct and well-worn approach; it is also an aggregation you pay for on every run, which is what pushes teams toward an indexed balance endpoint.

If you want Bitcoin balances, entity labels, UTXOs and fund flows already computed, reachable over a REST API as well as SQL, yes. BigQuery remains the better choice when the point is to keep raw chain tables next to your own data inside your warehouse and you are happy to build the aggregation layer.

Yes. SQL is one of the three access methods, alongside the REST API and dashboards, and it runs against the same fully-indexed Bitcoin chain. The schema is Bitcoin-native, so address, balance and UTXO queries stay short instead of expanding into multi-table joins over raw inputs and outputs.

No. BitcoinDatabase uses usage-based paid plans built for production data work. There is no free plan.

They meter different things. BigQuery bills $6.25 per TiB scanned in US regions with the first TiB monthly free, so cost follows how your query is written. Subscription APIs bill per call or per credit, typically $79 to $250 per month at moderate volume. Prices checked August 2026.

No. BitcoinDatabase provides informational on-chain data and analytics only. It is not investment, financial or legal advice, and nothing here is a signal or guarantee.

Explore the data

The Bitcoin data you can query here

Bitcoin address labels

Attach exchange, miner and service labels to addresses, so raw hashes read as entities.

Explore

Bitcoin address lookup

Look up any Bitcoin address: balance, full history and UTXOs in one query.

Explore

Bulk Bitcoin address balance checker

Check thousands of addresses in one pass, not twenty at a time.

Explore

Bitcoin data API

One Bitcoin data API and data provider for chain rows, balances, metrics and market history.

Explore

More comparisons

See how BitcoinDatabase compares

vs Glassnode

Glassnode alternative

Raw queryable Bitcoin data over REST, SQL and dashboards, not just curated charts.

vs Dune

Dune alternative

Bitcoin-only and fully-indexed, with a REST API too, not just cross-chain SQL.

vs Blockchair

Blockchair alternative

Bitcoin-deep with every UTXO, entity labels, metrics, SQL and dashboards.

vs Chainalysis

Chainalysis alternative

Developer-first, self-serve on-chain data with compliance tooling to support your own review.

vs BlockCypher

BlockCypher alternative

Bitcoin-native depth with SQL and dashboards, not just a multi-chain REST API.

vs Chainstack

Chainstack alternative

Indexed Bitcoin data over REST and SQL, not raw RPC nodes you still have to query.

vs Blockchain.com

Blockchain.com API alternative

Production-grade indexed Bitcoin data over REST and SQL, not a rate-capped free explorer API.

vs Mempool.space

Mempool.space alternative

Indexed address, balance and history data over REST and SQL, alongside mempool and fees, on production plans.

vs CoinAPI

CoinAPI alternative

On-chain Bitcoin data: addresses, balances, UTXOs and labels, not cross-asset market prices.

vs TRM Labs

TRM Labs alternative

Bitcoin-native on-chain data and screening signals over REST and SQL, not a full multi-chain investigations suite.

vs Whale Alert

Whale Alert alternative

Query large bitcoin transactions on your own thresholds from the fully-indexed chain, not just a fixed real-time feed.

vs CoinGecko

CoinGecko alternative

Raw on-chain Bitcoin data over REST and SQL, not market prices across thousands of coins.

vs CoinMarketCap

CoinMarketCap alternative

On-chain Bitcoin data over REST and SQL, where CoinMarketCap serves market prices.

vs Blockdaemon

Blockdaemon alternative

A query-first indexed Bitcoin database over REST and SQL, not raw node RPC infrastructure.

vs Xverse

Xverse alternative

Query indexed ordinals, inscriptions, BRC-20 and Runes data over REST and SQL, not just wallet and minting endpoints.

vs Bitquery

Bitquery alternative

Bitcoin-only depth over REST and SQL, billed on calls rather than on points that move with query shape.

vs TimechainIndex

TimechainIndex alternative

Bitcoin-only like TimechainIndex, with published pricing and a commercial REST API.

vs CryptoQuant

CryptoQuant alternative

API access on the entry plan and the raw chain underneath, not day-resolution metrics.

vs Alchemy

Alchemy alternative

An indexed Bitcoin database you query by address, not a Bitcoin Core JSON-RPC passthrough.

vs QuickNode

QuickNode alternative

An indexed Bitcoin database you query by address, not a managed Core node with the address-capable calls switched off.

vs Hiro

Hiro alternative

Hiro retired its Bitcoin Layer 1 APIs. The endpoints now answer HTTP 410 Gone, and the migration link inside that answer is itself dead.

vs Amberdata

Amberdata alternative

Amberdata belongs to Kaiko as of June 2026. Its pricing page loads but publishes no number, and its API answers a missing key three different ways.

vs Elliptic

Elliptic alternative

Elliptic publishes no pricing and sells its screening API only on a negotiated contract. We measured its endpoints, and the OFAC list underneath it, on 4 September 2026.

vs Merkle Science

Merkle Science alternative

Merkle Science publishes no pricing and gates every product behind a demo. We measured its site, its API documentation and its blockchain coverage on 6 September 2026.

vs Coin Metrics

Coin Metrics alternative

Coin Metrics is now Talos and its pricing page is gone. We measured the redirects, the free community API and the exact metrics it withholds on 8 September 2026.

vs CoinGlass

CoinGlass alternative

CoinGlass publishes exchange balances per wallet address, hourly and rounded, from $29 a month with no free tier. We measured its plans, its documented precision and its Bitcoin gaps on 10 September 2026.

vs Crypto APIs

Crypto APIs alternative

Crypto APIs covers 35+ networks from $49 a month. For Bitcoin fee rates, balances and history, we measured where a Bitcoin-only index does the job better and where it does not.

vs Tatum

Tatum alternative

Tatum covers 130+ blockchains from $49 a month. For Bitcoin history, balances at a past block and fee rates, we priced its plans and measured the Bitcoin side on 22 Sep 2026.

vs NOWNodes

NOWNodes alternative

NOWNodes sells shared node and Blockbook access across 100+ networks from 20 euros a month. We read its price list and hit its Bitcoin endpoints on 26 Sep 2026.

vs GetBlock

GetBlock alternative

GetBlock sells shared nodes on 130+ chains, priced in compute units, from $49 a month. We read its plan table and CU rules and probed its Bitcoin endpoints on 27 Sep 2026.

vs Arkham

Arkham Intelligence alternative

Arkham names wallets across seven networks and grants its API by application. We read its access terms and probed its API on 28 Sep 2026.

vs Santiment

Santiment alternative

Santiment sells 1,000+ metrics across 2,800 assets over GraphQL. We read its plans and tested its Bitcoin balance query against the chain on 29 Sep 2026.

vs Nansen

Nansen alternative

Nansen labels wallets across 38 chains, and Bitcoin is one of them. We read its API docs, credit table and pay-per-call terms on 30 Sep 2026.

vs Allium

Allium alternative

Allium sells enterprise blockchain data across dozens of chains, Bitcoin included. We read its docs, unit tables and keyless pricing on 1 Oct 2026.

vs Flipside

Flipside alternative

Flipside sold its blockchain data business to SonarX in May 2026 and its old domain now redirects to an enterprise AI product. We checked what is left on 2 Oct 2026.

vs SonarX

SonarX alternative

SonarX ships Bitcoin as Snowflake shares, file dumps and Kafka streams, and turns on Bitcoin balances and REST on request. We read its Bitcoin page and checked its pricing URL on 5 Oct 2026.

vs GoldRush

GoldRush alternative

GoldRush, the API formerly sold as Covalent, covers 100 plus chains and gives Bitcoin three endpoints. We read its Bitcoin docs and pricing page on 6 Oct 2026.

vs Scorechain

Scorechain alternative

Scorechain is a Luxembourg blockchain analytics firm covering 25 plus chains. We read its site, its QuickNode add-on docs and pricing on 7 Oct 2026.

vs AMLBot

AMLBot alternative

AMLBot sells wallet checks, KYT monitoring and KYC to crypto businesses across many chains. We read its site and plan guide on 8 Oct 2026.

See everything BitcoinDatabase can query

Query the whole Bitcoin blockchain in one place

An address in, structured on-chain data out. BitcoinDatabase serves balances, UTXOs, transactions, entity labels and fund flows, with address history back to the 2009 genesis block over REST, and SQL and dashboards over the indexed chain. No node to run.

See pricing

REST + SQL + dashboards · new blocks within seconds · informational on-chain data only